Métodos de avaliação cognitiva de pacientes com Síndrome de Apert e de Crouzon / Cognitive assessment methods of patients with Apert and Crouzon syndrome

A Craniossinostose Coronal bilateral implica em diminuição do Perímetro Craniano (PC) no eixo ântero-posterior (Braquicefalia) e frequentemente se associa ao aumento do eixo céfalo-caudal (vertical-altura) do crânio (Turricefalia), sendo um dos achados mais comuns nas Síndromes de Crouzon e Apert. Objetivo: Identificar, analisar e sintetizar os métodos de avaliação cognitiva apropriados para o acompanhamento da evolução de pacientes com cranioestenoses sindrômicas, em particular as síndromes de Apert e de Crouzon. Método: Trata-se de uma revisão de escopo. Para a formulação da pergunta norteadora da pesquisa e da estratégia de busca, foi utilizada a estratégia Population [((Apert OR Crouzon) AND (Disease OR Syndrom*))], Concept [((cognit* OR neurobehavioral OR neurocognit* OR neuropsyc*) AND (evaluation OR evaluations OR assessment OR "test" OR tests OR status OR development OR disorder OR disorders OR impairment OR impairments OR impaired OR function OR functions))] e Context (em qualquer contexto). Foram inclusos os artigos escritos em inglês, português e espanhol em qualquer período. A busca foi realizada nas bases de dados: Embase, Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE e rede BVS Salud. Resultados:Inúmeros testes de avaliação cognitiva validados internacionalmente foram aplicados aos pacientes com Apert e Crouzon, mas não se observou uma padronização (protocolo) seguida pelas várias unidades de assistência. Dos 75 tipos de Testes Cognitivos aplicados houve o predomínio da Escala de Inteligência de Wechsler (e seus subtestes), 50%. Na população avaliada predominou duas faixas etárias: escolares e adolescentes. As crianças com Apert e Crouzon obtiveram escores piores nos transtornos de socialização, atenção e internalização quando comparadas com o grupo normativo, sendo os piores resultados encontrados em Apert. Fatores que interferem no desenvolvimento neuropsicomotor: pressão intracraniana, malformações encefálicas, genética, idade na correção cirúrgica (postergação da primeira cirurgia após um ano de idade associou-se a um quociente de inteligência mais baixo), institucionalização, ambiente familiar, escolaridade dos cuidadores e nível socioeconômico. Considerações finais: os resultados obtidos contribuíram para maior conhecimento do perfil cognitivo dos pacientes com estas síndromes. Somente conhecendo as habilidades e dificuldades neuropsicomotoras, cognitivas e psicossociais dos pacientes com Apert e Crouzon é que as equipes de saúde, da escola e de cuidadores poderão entender melhor a capacidade perceptiva destes no processo de aprendizado e estarão mais aptas em atender as necessidades especiais destes pacientes e poderão ofertar os estímulos mais adequados no momento mais oportuno (AU).

Bilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis implies a decrease in the Cranial Perimeter (CP) in the anteroposterior axis (Brachycephaly) and is frequently associated with an increase in the cephalocaudal (vertical height) axis of the skull (Turrycephaly); being one of the most common findings in Crouzon and Apert Syndromes (Syndromic Craniosynostosis). In this Scope Review study, among the Syndromic Craniosynostosis, Apert and Crouzon Syndromes will be of special interest. Objective: This study aimed to identify, analyze, and synthesize the appropriate cognitive assessment methods for monitoring the evolution of patients with syndromic craniosynostosis, in particular Apert's and Crouzon's syndromes. Method: This is a scope review. In order to formulate the research guiding question and the searching strategy, the Population [((Apert OR Crouzon) AND (Disease OR Syndrom*))], Concept [((cognit* OR neurobehavioral OR neurocognit* OR neuropsyc*) AND (evaluation OR evaluations OR assessment OR "test" OR tests OR status OR development OR disorder OR disorders OR impairment OR impairments OR impaired OR function OR functions))] and Context (in any context) strategy was used. The articles written in English, Portuguese, and Spanish in any period were included. The search was performed in the following databases: Embase, Scopus, National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), and in the BVS Salud network (PAHO, WHO, BIREME, LILACS). Results: many internationally validated cognitive assessment tests were applied to patients with Apert and Crouzon, but no standardization (protocol) was followed. Of the 75 types of Cognitive Tests applied, the Wechsler Intelligence Scale predominated, 50%. In the evaluated population, two age groups predominated: school children and adolescents. Children with Apert and Crouzon had worse scores on disorders of socialization, attention, and internalization when compared to the normative group, with the worst results found in Apert. Factors that interfere with cognitive development: intracranial pressure, brain malformations, genetics, age at surgical correction, institutionalization, family environment, caregiver education, and socioeconomic status. Conclusion: the results contributed to a better understanding of the cognitive profile of patients with these syndromes and only by knowing about the neuropsychomotor, cognitive, and psychosocial skills and difficulties of these patients with Apert and Crouzon that health, school, and caregiver teams will be able to understand the perceptive capacity in the learning process of these patients deeply and will be able to offer the most appropriate stimuli at the most opportune time. Keywords: Apert, Crouzon, Neuropsyc, Tests, Development (AU).

Type II Pfieffer misdiagnosed as Crouzon syndrome with additional features of supernumerary teeth and localized symmetrical gigantism: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Pfieffer syndrome is among the syndromes seen in the recognized variant of the FGFR2 gene. There are several conditions related to this variant and a very closely related condition is Crouzon syndrome. This case is important to report because the neonate was a delayed referral from another region, without clear counseling and information on the gravity of situation. We describe additional features , not previously described in Pfieffer or Crouzon syndrome, supernumerary teeth and localized symmetrical gigantism of thumbs and great toes on both sides. That a genetic testing is essential to further manage and counsel to avoid lost opportunities for future births. Several cases are seen in this unit annually, and there is need for a more consolidated and comprehensive counseling and genetic testing. Once early diagnosis is done and the case is recognized to be untreatable, it was avert the need to refer. CASE PRESENTATION: A 2-week-old male African neonate referred from outside the region, presented with massive proptosis soon after delivery, with signs of pan-ophthalmitis and neonatal sepsis. The infant had additional multiple malformations and features initially diagnosed as Crouzon syndrome , but later confirmed after genetic testing to be Type II Pfieffer syndrome. A through clinical evaluation and genetic testing would prevent undue referral to a tertiary center, or if needed, the baby should have been referred much earlier. The uniqueness of this case is the presence of supernumerary teeth. CONCLUSION: A complicated, difficult to remedy case, referred to tertiary center, investigated, and sent back home with no significant intervention. Genetic test confirmed the typical findings of Pfieffer Type II. Presented for describing additional unique features of supernumerary teeth and localized gigantism and ethical challenges in management.

Crouzon syndrome and the eye: An overview.

The current literature review aims to evaluate the ocular findings and associated ophthalmic features in Crouzon syndrome. Craniosynostoses are syndromes characterized by premature fusion of sutures of the skull and Crouzon syndrome is the most common of the craniosynostosis syndromes. Early fusion of sutures results in craniofacial anomalies, including abnormalities of the orbits. To prepare this review of the ophthalmic findings in this disorder, an organized search on online databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Ovid was carried out. The key terms searched were "Crouzon", "craniosynostosis", "eye" and "ophthalmic", and 51 research items were found. A total of 17 articles were included after scrutiny of the databases and a further 25 articles were added after augmented search. A detailed review was performed from the final 42 articles. A comprehensive description of associated anomalies is given along with the author's own technique of surgical management in cases with Crouzon syndrome having bilateral luxation bulbi with exposure keratopathy. However, for optimum management of cranial and oculo-facial dysmorphisms, a multidisciplinary team of specialists is required.

A case of blepharophimosis: Freeman Sheldon syndrome.

PURPOSE: Important implications exist for ophthalmologists when considering possible early surgical intervention for potential amblyogenic anatomical abnormalities. The authors discuss the risks and benefits from an ophthalmological perspective of different interventions and review the genetic testing that confirmed the diagnosis. OBSERVATIONS: The authors describe the findings and management of an infant with Freeman Sheldon syndrome presenting with blepharophimosis of both eyelids resulting in inability to open both eyes during the first several days of life. Although the mode of inheritance for Freeman Sheldon syndrome (formerly known as Whistling Face Syndrome) is often autosomal dominant, our patient had no known family history of congenital abnormalities or consanguinity. However, genetic testing confirmed a heterozygous variant in MYH3, consistent with autosomal dominant Freeman Sheldon Syndrome. When our patient required gastrostomy (G-tube_placement, we performed an exam under anesthesia (EUA)). As is typical for Freeman Sheldon syndrome patients, intubation was difficult and complicated by pneumothorax. Eye-opening improved slightly after several weeks of life; however, the decision was made to proceed with eyelid surgery to prevent deprivation amblyopia. Surgery is scheduled for a future date. Additionally, the patient had congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction of the left eye; however, a probing and irrigation failed because of obstruction from the abnormal facial anatomy. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: Patients with Freeman Sheldon syndrome are at increased risk for complications from anesthesia and surgery. Risks and benefits should be strongly considered and discussed with parent(s)/guardian(s) prior to any surgical intervention. Genetic testing of the MYH3 gene can confirm the diagnosis.

Respective Roles of Craniosynostosis and Syndromic Influences on Cranial Fossa Development.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the detailed growth of the cranial fossae, even though they provide an important structural connection between the cranial vault and the facial skeleton. This study details the morphologic development of isolated cranial vault synostosis and associated syndromes on cranial fossa development. METHODS: A total of 125 computed tomographic scans were included (nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, n = 36; Apert syndrome associated with bicoronal synostosis, n = 24; Crouzon syndrome associated with bicoronal synostosis, n = 11; and controls, n = 54). Three-dimensional analyses were produced using Materialise software. RESULTS: The regional anterior and middle cranial fossae volumes of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis are characterized by significant increases of 43 percent (p < 0.001) and 60 percent (p < 0.001), respectively, and normal posterior cranial fossa volume. The cranial fossae depths of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis were increased, by 37, 42, and 21 percent (all p < 0.001) for anterior, middle, and posterior cranial fossae, respectively, accompanying the shortened cranial fossae lengths. The volume and morphology of all cranial fossae in Apert syndrome nearly paralleled nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis. However, Crouzon syndrome had reduced depths of cranial fossae, and more restricted fossa volumes than both Apert syndrome and nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis. CONCLUSIONS: Cranial vault suture synostosis is likely to be more influential on cranial fossae development than other associated influences (genetic, morphologic) in Apert and Crouzon syndromes. Isolated Apert syndrome pathogenesis is associated with an elongation of the anterior cranial fossa length in infants, whereas in Crouzon syndrome, there is a tendency to reduce cranial fossa depth, suggesting individual adaptability in cranial fossae development related to vault synostosis.

Severe chemosis and treatment following fronto-orbital advancement surgery for Crouzon syndrome: A case report.

RATIONALE: Crouzon syndrome is a craniofacial malformation caused by premature fusion of fibrous sutures in infants. It is one of the most common craniosynostosis syndromes, and surgery is the only effective treatment for correcting it. Postoperative complications such as encephalocele, infections, hematoma have been reported. We herein report a case of a 62-month-old boy with Crouzon syndrome who underwent fronto-orbital advancing osteotomy, cranial vault remolding, and extensive osteotomy and subsequently developed left proptosis and severe chemosis, these complications are rare and we believe it will be of use to clinicians, physicians, and researchers alike. PATIENT CONCERNS: The patient's skull had been malformed since birth, and he had been experiencing paroxysmal headaches coupled with vomiting for 4 months. Having never received prior treatment, he underwent fronto-orbital advancement at our clinic; afterward, left proptosis and severe chemosis occurred. DIAGNOSIS: The patient was diagnosed with Crouzon syndrome, and the complications included left proptosis and severe chemosis, confirmed by the clinical manifestations, physical examination, and computed tomography (CT). INTERVENTION: We carried out cranial vault remodeling and fronto-orbital advancement. We applied ophthalmic chlortetracycline ointment on the conjunctivae, elevated the patient's head, evacuated the hematoma, and carried out a left blepharorrhaphy. OUTCOMES: The proptosis and chemosis resolved with no recurrence. No other complications occurred during the follow-up period (12 months), and CT scans revealed that the hematoma had disappeared. The calvarial vault reshaping was satisfactorily performed, and the patient's vision was not impaired. LESSONS: Severe proptosis and chemosis are rare complications that can occur after fronto-orbital advancement for Crouzon syndrome. A detailed preoperative examination (including magnetic resonance imaging and CT) is essential for diagnosis. Complete hemostasis, evacuation of hematoma, and placement of a periorbital drainage tube during surgery all contribute to an effective treatment plan. An ophthalmic ointment should be administered, and the patient's head should be elevated during the procedure. Evacuation of retrobulbar epidural hematoma and blepharorrhaphy could also help relieve proptosis and chemosis. Our report describes 2 rare complications associated with the treatment for Crouzon syndrome, and we believe it will be of use to clinicians, physicians, and researchers alike.

What Is the Difference in Cranial Base Morphology in Isolated and Syndromic Bicoronal Synostosis?

BACKGROUND: The association of isolated craniosynostosis and the influence of syndromic forms confound the understanding of craniofacial morphologic development. This study attempts to clarify the individual influences of isolated bicoronal synostosis, Apert syndrome, and Crouzon syndromes on skull base morphology. METHODS: One hundred seventeen computed tomographic scans were included (nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, n = 36; Apert syndrome with bicoronal synostosis, n = 25; Crouzon syndrome with bicoronal synostosis, n = 11; controls, n = 45). Cephalometric measurements were analyzed using Materialise software. RESULTS: Nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis patients developed a shortened cranial base length, with a significantly shortened distance between nasion and sella (p = 0.005). The cranial base angles of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis in both the cranial side (N-S-BA) and facial side (N-SO-BA) increased significantly, by 17.04 degrees (p < 0.001) and 11.75 degrees (p < 0.001), respectively. However, both the N-S-BA and N-SO-BA angles of Apert syndrome and Crouzon syndrome were narrowed more than that of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis [by 12.11 degrees (p < 0.001) and 12.44 degrees (p < 0.001), respectively, in Apert syndrome; and by 11.66 degrees (p = 0.007) and 13.71 degrees (p = 0.007), respectively, in Crouzon syndrome]. However, there is no statistically significant difference of these two angles between Apert syndrome and Crouzon syndrome, when they were only associated with bicoronal synostosis. Contrary to the relatively normal subcranial space of nonsyndromic bicoronal synostosis, both Apert and Crouzon syndromes developed a reduced subcranial space. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated bicoronal synostosis resulted in a flattened cranial base, whereas Apert syndrome and Crouzon syndrome developed a normal cranial base angle when only associated with bicoronal synostosis. The syndromic skulls had additional significantly reduced subcranial space.

Anomalous extraocular muscles in Crouzon syndrome with V-pattern exotropia.

Strabismus associated with Crouzon syndrome is common and often complex. V-pattern strabismus is most commonly reported in this condition and is mainly thought to be due to an excyclorotation of the orbits and rectus muscle pulleys. We report two cases of children with Crouzon syndrome and V-pattern exotropia who had rectus muscle heterotopy on orbital imaging and were also found intraoperatively to have anomalous extraocular muscles. At the time of surgery, bifid insertion, misdirection, and fibrosis of extraocular muscles were noted. This highlights the various causes of V-pattern strabismus associated with Crouzon syndrome, including dysmorphic orbits and extraocular muscle anomalies.

Jean-Charles Chatelin (1884-1948), counted among the "Righteous", but forgotten as a neurologist who studied under Pierre Marie.

Charles Chatelin (1884-1948) studied under Pierre Marie (1853-1940) at hôpital La Salpêtrière and went on to a career profoundly affected by World War I. He wrote a remarkable thesis on the clinical aspects and radiography of hereditary craniofacial dysostosis, which had been recently described by Octave Crouzon (1874-1938). A few days after the publication of Georges Guillain (1876-1961) and Alexandre Barré (1880-1967), Chatelin published a comprehensive study of the eponymous syndrome. His study was prepared before that of Guillain and Barré, but only their names are remembered. After examining patients with spinal injuries, Chatelin and Pierre Marie gave the first description of what would become, in 1924, "Lhermitte's sign." The eponym was first used after this sensory symptom was added by Lhermitte to the clinical picture of multiple sclerosis. In 1915, Chatelin and Pierre Marie used a technique based on radiographic overlays to localize intracranial projectiles. They coupled this with precise examinations of the visual field of wounded soldiers, in order to map out the intra-cerebral visual pathways with accuracy. During World War II, Chatelin and his wife demonstrated their empathy by hiding a Jewish family in their home until Paris was liberated.

Extremely severe scoliosis, heterotopic ossification, and osteoarthritis in a three-generation family with Crouzon syndrome carrying a mutant c.799T>C FGFR2.

BACKGROUND: Crouzon syndrome is a rare and complex autosomal dominant craniosynostosis syndrome with a prevalence of approximately 1 in 60,000 births. The typical features are craniosynostosis, proptosis, midfacial hypoplasia, and noncranial manifestations, including deformities in the cervical spine, elbow, and fingers. Crouzon syndrome is usually caused by pathogenic variants in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) gene. METHODS: We reported a three-generation family with Crouzon syndrome; the proband showed extremely severe limb abnormalities. The clinical features were obtained by physical examination and radiographic examination. Sanger sequencing of all 18 exons of FGFR2 was conducted to identify the disease-causing mutation. RESULTS: The proband was a 44-year-old man who showed characteristics of Crouzon syndrome, including craniofacial dysostosis, shallow orbits, proptosis, midface hypoplasia, beaked nose, strabismus, short superior lip, short stature, and neck injection. In addition to these typical characteristics, radiographic examination showed severe scoliosis, heterotopic ossification of the elbows, knee osteoarthritis, metacarpophalangeal joint valgus, collapse of the articular surface of the thumb metacarpal, knuckle ossification and fusion. Sanger sequencing identified a heterozygous pathogenic variant c.799T>C, p.(Ser267Pro) in exon 7 of FGFR2 in affected individuals. CONCLUSION: Crouzon syndrome in this three-generation family was caused by c.799T>C FGFR2, and the patient showed a different phenotypic appearance from other Crouzon patients with c.799T>C FGFR2.

A Crouzon syndrome from the Classic period of Maya civilization?

This article describes a retrospective diagnosis through an artistic representation of a pre-Columbian Central America bowl figuring a child with clinical characteristics of Crouzon syndrome. The report also highlights the importance of icono-diagnosis for a better description of the existing diseases into ancient societies.